Website accessibility
Show or hide the menu bar
Main home
Section home
|
Content
Calendar
Links
|
Log in
|
Home

Concordat Watch - Croatia - content area

Protest against Concordat with the Vatican Held in Zagreb

A demonstration against concordats was held in Croatia in 2016, demanding abolition of Croatia’s concordats with the Vatican, claiming they cost Croatians more than a billion kuna a year (over 140 million US dollars) and violate separation of church and state.

Protest against Concordat with the Vatican Held in Zagreb

By Vedran Pavlic
Total Croatia News, 22 October 2016
https://www.total-croatia-news.com/item/14566-protest-against-concordat-with-the-vatican-held-in-zagreb


Protesters demand the annulment of agreements signed by Croatia and the Catholic Church.

On Saturday, a protest of about 400 people was held in Zagreb with participants demanding the annulment of what they describe as damaging agreements between Croatia and the Vatican, which negate the provisions of the Croatian Constitution about secularity and separation of religious communities and the state, reports Index.hr on October 22, 2016. [...]

They said that it was time to annul “harmful contracts with the Holy See” which cost Croatian citizens more than a billion kuna a year. The majority of Croatian citizens, they claim, have been turned into second-class citizens. Due to the agreements, we are not all equal before the law because they allow clergy a privileged position at the courts and public institutions, and allow systematic discrimination of groups which Catholic hierarchy also discriminates – women and LGBT people, and all non-Catholics, said the organizers. [...]

Alan Sorić said that more and more political parties were starting to recognize this problem. He said that particularly problematic were “interference and pressures” by the Catholic Church as the dominant religious community on issues of abortion and education, including compulsory prayers in kindergartens. Marijana Bijelić said that the agreements with the Vatican do not bring anything good to Croatian citizens, just huge obligations. “We think that the work of the Church in the political field is harmful and represents the abuse of religion to gain political power”, she said. [...]

Croatian Activists Demand End to Church Concordats

Secular campaigners plan rally demanding end to deals with Vatican which they say are too expensive and undermine secular values.

Sven Milekic
Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN), 21 October 2016
http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/croatian-activists-want-holy-see-concordats-terminated-10-20-2016-2

Secular campaigners are organising a protest in Zagreb on Saturday, demanding abolition of Croatia’s concordats with the Holy See, claiming they incur massive financial obligations and breach secular principles.

The Movement for Secular Croatia – an informal network of atheist, agnostic and secular NGOs and individuals, have called the protest ‘Termination 4”.

Croatia and the Holy See have signed four concordats regulating all the obligations of the state towards the Catholic Church.

The key concordats regulate how much money Church gets from the state budget and the role of the Church in education and culture – which envisages religious education classes in state kindergartens and primary and high schools.

Although Croatia is predominantly Catholic – over 86 per cent of the population in the 2011 census declared themselves Catholic, and although the Church has a considerable place in Croat national history and identity, not everyone approves of the significant concessions given to the Church.

Alan Soric, a legal expert from the secularist NGO Protagora – part of the movement organising the protest – told BIRN the protest is being held because of “daily breaches of the secularity of the Croatian constitution” in implementing the concordats.

“In general, in the concordats, Croatia has only obligations, while the Church has rights,” he said, pointing to Church’s influence on education.

“Specifically, this especially concerns state schools, where Catholic religious education is held and pupils go to Catholic services,” he said, mentioning also the controversy over the proposed merger of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Studies and the Catholic Theology Faculty in Zagreb.

Soric says the situation will not improve until the concordats are scrapped, since they prescribe the teaching of religious education in school inside regular schedule, although not all pupils attending the classes are Catholic.

An additional hot issue are “the massive financial obligations Croatia has towards the Catholic Church”, he says.

The money given to the Church annually ranges between 33 and 80 million euros, depending on what is included in the sum, he noted.

He notes that besides paying two average Croatian gross monthly salaries – 1,070 euros in 2015 – to each of the 1,600 Catholic parishes, the state pays for religious education teachers and for the printing of textbooks – both chosen and approved by the Church without requiring the consent of the state.

The state also covers the cost of renovation Church property and of chaplains in the military and hospitals. The Church is also exempt from payment of taxes for its donations – unlike all other humanitarian organisations.

“This doesn’t count the money given by local authorities, which are not recorded in any way,” he explained. “There are over 2,000 NGOs which were directly created by the Church or closely affiliated, and which are in part financed by the state,” Soric concluded.

An analysis of the money given to the Church by the state done by an independent media outlet, Lupiga.com, in 2014, came to the figure of over 1.1 billion euros paid to the Church between 1996 and 2013.

Catholic theologian Drago Pilsel told BIRN that although he “doesn’t share the views of some somewhat radical groups and individuals in the Movement for Secular Croatia”, he agrees that the Church “maybe receives too much money from the state, having in mind the state of public finances”.

“It’s not fair to take someone’s money to finance the Church without his consent. I advocate the German model, under which each individual decides … which religious community or NGO, according to their personal beliefs, they pay a part of their taxes to,” he said.

Nevertheless, Pilsel said he doubted radical atheists and secularists would “have any effect on the general population”.


Go to Notanant menuWebsite accessibility

Access level: public

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies: OK